| Validation? I dont need validation nor do I need an honest answer to my question. I only asked you if you were capable of providing an honest answer. You and I both know that there is no other reason for the biased conjecture you and others spew forth other than that your clique does not accept me, my products, or anything I have to say. I could tell your group that the sky is blue and I would ceratinly face oppositiion to my position on the matter. These sorts of personal attacks lost their effect some time ago. I realize that I will never win in such arguments - any effort to do so will simply result in further conjecture. In very short time the exchange becomes a Jerry Springer show, just like it has now. Most people enjoy the entertainment this gives - it is exciting. :) But at the same time, just as when you or anyone else watches a Jerry Springer episode, we understand that its purpose is solely for entertainment. I only asked a simple question to you - one that has a simple answer. For the sole fact that you avoided answering it decisively, I'll take that as your lack of the ability to substantiate your argument and simply answer for you, redundantly. As I said before, I really dont need an answer from you. I dont need "validation" from you or anyone else to realize why you and some others continually object to my efforts. You and I both know why that is. I only asked for you to explain the criteria on which your recommendation was based. You did say that it is based on an element of customer service, however, we all know that my question was asking for empirical data showing the performance benefits of the product. To you this is just a source of entertainment - we know why you do it. Admittedly, you have a very keen ability for debate - I've got to make sure I sharpen my knives before I step into the ring with you. But where is your objectivity here? As expected, you didn't answer my question - you simply eluded my point in typical, rhetorical, Kenny fashion. So, maybe my tests with the 2.5" intake piping were flawed. Without any other data to either support or debunk what I found, how do any of us know whether or not the data I collected is accurate or not? You may pose your recommendation to buy the piping from TOM based on customer service but are you suggesting that people buy products for their cars based solely on this attribute? We all know this isn't your position - we know you are sharper than that. Do you think 2.5" intake piping is beneficial to performance or not? If so, what evidence do you have to support your position? I know that there are certain members of this forum who just dont like me. In the moments passed during the compilation of the original post about my new product I knew exactly what to expect. Did it deter me? Obviously not. Why? The honest answer is that I know most members of this forum can see through the riff-raf and make their own decisions based on the things that really matter. How do I know this? It is simple; I have the numbers, my books tell me a lot. Even if you dispute what I'm saying here, wouldn't you believe that with all the "bad press" you and others put out there about me and my products that I would have gone out of business long ago? How much do you really think you are hurting me? Bottom line is: you guys are the minority. You are the 90% that make the most noise but only 10% of what really goes on. Interestingly enough, even what you would consider as "bad press" actually has a positive effect. I've correlated such posts and their effects to positive sale volume. The more you guys try, the more it helps. I dont need an answer - I know what's up just as much as the larger majority of member here do - the only question remaining is whether or not you realize what's really going on.....
[ ashspecz.com ]
[ agpowers@bellsouth.net ] Enthusiasts soon understand each other. --W. Irving.
Are you an enthusiast? If you are out to describe the truth, leave elegance to the tailor.
Albert Einstein
|
